White Paper | Unknown 360 Email Test Report
Explore the Unknown 360 Email Test Report evaluating protection against unknown malware, ransomware, and malicious attachments. Learn how Check Point Email & Collaboration achieved a 98.3% catch rate using advanced threat prevention, sandboxing, and AI-powered cyber security.

© 2021 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. All rights reserved. [Protected] Non-confidential content
Unknown 360 Email Test Report | White Paper
1
INTRODUCTION Organizations today are experiencing previously unseen volumes of email traffic. This is
in part due to the shift to remote working because of the recent Covid-19 pandemic. As
such, email has become an increasingly lucrative target for cyber attackers. Phishing,
impersonation, and malware attacks are all rampant, and most organizations are still
only marginally protected against these types of attacks. According to a recent Cyber
Security Statistics report from PurpleSec (https://tinyurl.com/4dmf3zv7 ), 92% of
malware is delivered by email. Much of this malware is ransomware, and in fact, in 2020
alone, there were over 304m global ransomware attacks and 127 newly discovered
ransomware families. (https://www.statista.com/topics/4136/ransomware/)
In this report, we'll discuss the research and findings, the importance of scanning for
malware and ransomware, and why basic AV scanning isn't enough. As this report
shows, securing your enterprise without proper malware protection is a recipe for
disaster. Some of today's most popular email security solutions do not effectively scan
for unknown malware, and don't have the experience necessary to block sophisticated
malicious attachments. Without proper malware scanning, organizations leave
themselves vulnerable to ransomware and other harmful attacks.
Across 4 vendors, including Check Point, Microsoft, Mimecast, and Proofpoint, Check
Point security solutions led with the industry’s best catch rate of 98.3%, followed by
Microsoft at 90%.
TEST OVERVIEW Check Point research analysts downloaded a sample set of 360 well-known malicious
PDF, DOC, XLS and executable files from Google’s “VirusTotal” database. They then
used a simple technique to create new and unknown variants (hence the “Unknown
360”) from existing malware. The resulting 360 samples preserved the original malicious
functionality but are unknown and unregistered in any hash-based database such as
VirusTotal. With this set of unknown malware samples, the analysts tested Check Point
and other vendors’ solutions ability to detect new and unknown malware.
TESTED VENDORS • Check Point Harmony Email & Office – Anti-phishing, Anti-Malware, Sandbox, CDR
• Microsoft Defender ATP O365 Plan 2 – Anti-phishing, Anti-Malware, Sandbox, CDR
• Mimecast M2 Integrated Email Security – Anti-phishing, Anti-Malware, Sandbox, CDR
• Proofpoint Business Essentials – Anti-phishing, Anti-Malware
UNKNOWN 360 EMAIL TEST REPORT TESTING MALWARE CATCH RATE OF LEADING EMAIL SECURITY SOLUTIONS
ACROSS 4 LEADING EMAIL SECURITY VENDORS, CHECK POINT SECURITY SOLUTIONS LED WITH INDUSTRY’S BEST CATCH RATE FOR UNKNOWN MALWARE
© 2021 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. All rights reserved. [Protected] Non-confidential content Q4 2021
Unknown 360 Email Test Report | White Paper
2
To ensure the test validity, platforms were updated with the latest updates available from
each vendor as of mid-June 2021. The test configuration also matched the vendor’s best
practices. The only objective of the test was to test the catch rate of malicious files.
Performance was not tested and did not influence the test results in any way.
SECURITY FINDINGS As the Check Point research analysts were conducting the “Unknown 360” test, they
came across several security findings that are important to the subject of email-borne
malware, and ransomware in email is a huge concern – in 2019, ransomware in phishing
emails increased 109%. (https://tinyurl.com/adw2zew)
File Sandboxing Each vendor provides a cloud-based sandbox solution that serves to evaluate and
analyze previously undiscovered files for malicious content and/or activity. As the results
show, Check Point’s Harmony solution provides a much superior catch rate, with CPU-
level detection, AI capabilities, and real-time threat intelligence gathered from millions of
global sensors. See more information on the industry-leading Check Point Sandblast
Threat Emulation here.
Content Disarm & Reconstruction (CDR) Content Disarm & Reconstruction is a relatively new feature that provides real -time
sanitization of document files as they are being delivered. This allows the end user to
avoid waiting for the time-consuming sandboxing process to be completed in order to
have a usable file. During testing, it was observed that Microsoft’s solution only provided
a preview version of the file, while still allowing the user to click on malicious links,
negating the value of sandboxing. The Mimecast solution was able to provide a clean
version of files; however, because of the inferior catch rate for certain file types, the end
user is able to request the original malicious file, rendering the CDR version useless.
Proofpoint does not provide this capability, which means users must wait on average 3-5
minutes for full analysis to receive attachments.
Attachment File Type As previously discussed in the Test Overview section, this test included 360 files, divided
evenly between DOC, PDF, XLS, and EXE types. Not surprisingly, Check Point Harmony
Email & Office had the highest catch rate across all file types – 98.3%. Microsoft
Defender for O365 fell short in detecting malicious EXE file types, performing at only
70%. Mimecast failed to even deliver a decent catch rate for malicious PDF file types,
coming in at only 13.3% effectiveness! Proofpoint did well with documents, but was very
inefficient with EXE types, with only a 63.3% catch rate!
CREATING THE UNKNOWN360 TEST METHODOLOGY To develop the unknown malware test, the researchers queried VirusTotal for pdf, doc ,
xls and portable executable files that were detected as malicious by at least 10 antivirus
engines, in other words, known malware. All candidate files were recently uploaded to
VirusTotal and demonstrated various malicious behaviors. From this selection, 360 files
were randomly chosen (90 PDF, 90 EXE, 90 XLS, and 90 DOC).
After testing solutions using these 360 known malware files, Check Point research
analysts added a null to the end of each PDF, XLS, and DOC file (e.g. “echo `0000’ >>
1.doc”). See Figure 1 below. In addition, an “unused” header section was modified on
each executable file. The analysts then opened and ran each file to validate that the
original behavior was kept unchanged. For the executables, a free tool named LordPE
was used to change the checksum as shown in Figure 2 (below). You can find a regularly
updated repository of malicious files at https://poc-files.threat-cloud.com to recreate this test in your own lab.
MICROSOFT AND MIMECAST SANDBOX CANNOT DETECT EVASIVE MALWARE
MIMECAST IS INEFFECTIVE AT DETECTING MALICIOUS PDF DOCUMENTS
MICROSOFT MISSED 3 OUT OF EVERY 10 MALICIOUS EXECUTABLE FILES
MICROSOFT CDR STILL ALLOWS USERS TO CLICK MALICIOUS LINKS
PROOFPOINT IS VERY WEAK IN DETECTING EXES AND HAS NO CDR CAPABILITY
© 2021 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. All rights reserved. [Protected] Non-confidential content Q4 2021
Unknown 360 Email Test Report | White Paper
3
Figure 2: Creating new malware using LordPE
Figure 1: Manipulating documents using echo command
© 2021 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. All rights reserved. [Protected] Non-confidential content Q4 2021
Unknown 360 Email Test Report | White Paper
4
LAB SETUP A lab was setup to simulate the reality of a user receiving an email with a malicious file attached. All platforms in the
test were activated with the maximum number of threat prevention services (Anti-Virus, CDR, Threat Emulation) and
with the most up-to-date signatures. The Unknown 360 files were a mix of 25% PDF files, 25% EXE files, 25% XLS
files, and 25% DOC files. The files were attached to an email that was sent using an unknown, external sender
address to a Microsoft 365 email address protected by each of the 3 competing solutions , simulating a real-world
email malware attack. Different source email addresses were used to avoid blacklisting of the sender address.
TEST RESULTS The combined known malware catch rate across all file types is shown in Figure 3 below. Figure 4 details unknown
malicious file test results. As previously mentioned, Check Point Harmony Email & Office was the most successful
solution across all file types for unknown malware. Figures 5 & 6 break down the rate of prevention for unknown
malicious document and executable file types, respectively. As we see, the expected results are 100% identification
of known malware for all solutions.
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%
Known Malware Catch Rate
Proofpoint Business Essentials Mimecast Email Security
Microsoft Defender for O365 Harmony Email & Collaboration
Figure 3: Known malware catch rate
© 2021 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. All rights reserved. [Protected] Non-confidential content Q4 2021
Unknown 360 Email Test Report | White Paper
5
70.0%
89.2%
90.0%
98.3%
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%
Unknown Malware Catch Rate - All File Types
Mimecast Email Security Proofpoint Buisness Essentials
Microsoft Defender for O365 Harmony Email & Collaboration
51.7%
96.7%
97.8%
97.8%
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%
Unknown Malicious Office Docs and PDFs Only
Mimecast Email Security Microsoft Defender O365
Proofpoint Business Essentials Harmony Email & Collaboration
Figure 4: Unknown malware catch rate
Figure 5: Unknown Malicious documents prevention
© 2021 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. All rights reserved. [Protected] Non-confidential content Q4 2021
Unknown 360 Email Test Report | White Paper
6
DID YOU KNOW? Executables can come in many forms, such as DLL and JavaScript, and they
are often embedded in Document files to hide from inspection. ( link to source)
63.3%
70.0%
76.7%
100.0%
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%
Unknown Malicious Executable Prevention in Emails
Proofpoint Business Essentials Microsoft Defender for O365
Mimecast Email Security Harmony Email & Collaboration
Figure 6: Unknown malicious EXE prevention
© 2021 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. All rights reserved. [Protected] Non-confidential content Q4 2021
Unknown 360 Email Test Report | White Paper
7
See below for a brief comparison of the Threat Prevention capabilities of Email Security solutions of all
types. For a full capabilities comparison click here.
engine ever.
CONTACT US Worldwide Headquarters | 5 Shlomo Kaplan Street, Tel Aviv 67897, Israel | Tel: 972-3-753-4555 | Fax: 972-3-624-1100 | Email: info@checkpoint.com
U.S. Headquarters | 959 Skyway Road, Suite 300, San Carlos, CA 94070 | Tel: 800-429-4391; 650-628-2117 | Fax: 650-654-4233 | www.checkpoint.com
© 2021 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. All rights reserved. [Protected] Non-confidential content Q4 2021
Unknown 360 Email Test Report | White Paper
8
SUMMARY When it comes to protecting your organization’s business email users, it is imperative to choose an email security
solution with the industry’s best malware catch rate. Your organization’s security should not be at risk from the
Unknown 360. If you would like to replicate this test, please contact us at EmailSecurity@checkpoint.com.
Detecting and preventing advanced and evasive unknown malware is a challenge that traditional email security solutions aren’t up to the task for. And with the rise in ransomware, organizations MUST employ the most advanced protection or run the risk of severe monetary and reputation damage. Phishing protection is also a must for preventing ransomware attacks. See why preventing advanced unknown phishing attacks is key to stoppin g ransomware here. Check Point and Avanan provide the most advanced email protection on the market, combining a malware catch rate that is far superior to the competition in email security and the most effective anti-phishing in the world!