What is a True Positive Rate in Cybersecurity?
True positive rate in cybersecurity measures how effectively a system identifies threats. It is defined as the number of correct alerts for malicious activity in a given period as a function of the true number of malicious events that occurred.
Also known as “sensitivity” or “security quality,” true positive rate is a critical metric that reflects the threat detection accuracy of a security system. A high true positive rate indicates that security tools are effectively detecting attacks targeting your organization. Maximizing this metric is a critical goal across a wide range of security systems, including intrusion detection systems (IDS), endpoint protection platforms, firewalls, and Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions.
Understanding and Calculating True Positive Rates
To understand true positives in cybersecurity, it is essential to consider the possible outcomes that occur when monitoring activity or scanning files for malicious content. The system either returns a positive result (indicating that the tool detects malicious activity) or a negative result (indicating that the tool does not detect malicious activity), and it is either correct (true) or incorrect (false). Therefore, the four possible outcomes are:
- True Positive: A security alert correctly identifies a real threat or malicious activity
- False Positive: A security alert incorrectly flags benign activity as a threat
- True Negative: Legitimate, non-malicious activity is correctly identified as safe
- False Negative: A real threat goes undetected, allowing malicious activity to occur unnoticed
The real number of threats that occur during a specific period is the combined total of true positives and false negatives. True Positive Rate (TPR) is calculated from the number of correctly identified threats divided by the total number of threats, using the following formula:
True Positive Rate (TPR) = True Positives ÷ (True Positives + False Negatives)
This metric highlights how often your system successfully identifies actual threats compared to how often it misses them. A higher true positive rate indicates stronger threat detection accuracy, while a lower TPR suggests gaps exposing your organization to attacks. This formula highlights the importance of minimizing false negatives or missed threats.
Monitoring the true positive rate over an extended period, when faced with a wide variety of attacks, allows the metric to estimate the probability that a security system will correctly identify a threat.
True Positive Vs False Positive and Balanced Accuracy
While the true positive rate is a vital metric when assessing the quality of threat detection tools, it shouldn’t be considered in isolation. In particular, true positives in cybersecurity are closely linked with false positives. The techniques and thresholds required to trigger an alert will determine how many true positives vs false positives security teams must deal with.
For example, maximizing true positives often comes at the expense of a higher false positive rate. In this instance, the value of catching every threat is diminished by the need for human analysts to sift through large numbers of incorrect alerts. This wastes valuable resources, erodes analyst efficiency, and increases the risk of overlooked incidents as security teams become spread too thin. Very high false positive rates can lead to alert fatigue, where security teams no longer trust the output of security tools.
A more comprehensive parameter for defining threat detection accuracy is balanced accuracy, which is the average of the true positive rate and the true negative rate.
Balanced Accuracy = (True Positive Rate + True Negative Rate) ÷ 2
Balanced accuracy provides a fairer assessment of threat detection performance by taking into account the true negative rate, which is related to the false negative rate by the following equation:
True Negative Rate = 1 – False Negative Rate.
Therefore, security systems with high balanced accuracy typically catch most threats without generating significant false alerts. This metric prevents overconfidence in systems that appear strong but excel only at one aspect of detection. By monitoring true positive rate alongside balanced accuracy, organizations can ensure more reliable and effective security operations.
The Value of High True Positive Rates
With a high true positive rate, your security systems can accurately identify threats, providing the foundation for a robust security posture. This includes:
-
- Faster Response Times: Detection tools with high true positive rates help minimize dwell time, the period between initial compromise and detection. This directly improves incident response speed, containment, and other remediation efforts to stop threats from spreading laterally throughout your systems
- Minimizing Business Risk: Threats that remain undetected are more likely to result in significant data breaches, business disruptions, compliance issues, and reputational damage. By catching threats early, you can minimize business risk and protect your market position
- Optimal Resource Allocation: From a financial standpoint, improving your true positive rate without significantly impacting false positives ensures that security teams can optimize investments and allocate resources efficiently. Instead of chasing false alarms, analysts focus their time and expertise on real incidents. With finite security budgets, maximizing true positives ensures that every dollar contributes to meaningful risk reduction
- Validating Threat Intelligence: By accurately monitoring true positive rates across various security tools, you can both validate and enhance the accuracy of threat intelligence information. Accurate detection data feeds back into security models, improving future detection accuracy and strengthening defenses over time. If detection systems reliably confirm real-world attacks, intelligence feeds can be tuned with greater precision, increasing the overall threat detection accuracy
As organizations invest in various advanced security tools, monitoring the true positive rate provides a guiding metric to ensure that security spending directly translates into improved threat detection accuracy, even against evolving cyber threats.
Monitoring True Positive Rate Across Different Tools
In traditional security tools, the true positive rate is typically measured by testing how well predefined signatures or rules catch known threats. These tools are highly effective at flagging well-understood attack patterns, but they can struggle with new or evolving techniques. Monitoring the true positive rate in this context requires analyzing historical alerts, validating incidents, and comparing true positives vs false negatives using the formula defined above.
However, with the rise of machine learning detection models, calculating the true positive rate involves evaluating model performance against labeled datasets, often in tandem with other metrics such as balanced accuracy. Unlike rule-based systems, machine learning tools adapt by learning from massive datasets and identifying patterns that might indicate malicious behavior.
By calculating true positive rate security metrics across both traditional and advanced tools, organizations can gain a comprehensive view of threat detection accuracy. This measurement not only guides tuning and optimization but also provides a clear benchmark for improving the true positive rate over time as threats evolve and tools mature.
Best Practices for Maximizing Your True Positive Rate
Maximizing the true positive rate of your security systems allows IT teams to catch every possible threat. This requires traditional and advanced tools to spot both known and zero-day threats.
However, as we’ve discussed, it is difficult to improve true positive rates without also increasing the number of false positives. The following best practices provide a roadmap for organizations seeking to improve their threat detection accuracy, enabling human analysts to focus on actual threats without wasting time on false positives.
Continuous Tuning and Refinement of Detection Rules
Detection rules and policies in security systems must be regularly updated and continuously refined to reduce false positives and adapt to new threats. Sophisticated threats incorporate evasion techniques that bypass static rules, learning how to hide malicious payloads from typical detection methods.
Threat detection tuning involves adjusting the risk score threshold required to trigger an alert, the factors that contribute to the risk score, the calculation method for the risk score, and the latest threat intelligence data from a range of trusted sources.
Advanced Threat Intelligence Integration
Integrating advanced threat intelligence is essential, as it provides detection tools with the information needed to identify the latest signatures and accurately detect new evasion techniques. High-quality, curated intelligence feeds provide valuable indicators of compromise (IoCs) and context that enable detection systems to better distinguish between benign activity and genuine malicious behavior. Validating IoCs against internal data means teams can increase their true positive rate while filtering out unnecessary signals.
Data Enrichment and Contextualization
Raw logs from security systems become far more useful when enriched with metadata such as asset importance, user behavior, and geolocation. Contextualization offers vital tuning data to more accurately assess risk scores. This enables security teams to refine alerts, resulting in higher-quality signals and enhanced threat detection accuracy.
Empowering and Training Security Teams
Ongoing analyst training helps teams distinguish between true positives vs false positives and false negatives. Even with automation and AI-driven detection models, human expertise can be vital for identifying subtle attack signals. Ongoing training ensures teams remain capable of recognizing true positives in cybersecurity and feeding valuable insights back into future detection models.
Proactive Threat Hunting and Red Teaming
Proactively hunting for threats that evade automated systems and running red team exercises strengthens defenses through testing with realistic attack scenarios. These practices expose blind spots, test detection rules, and generate actionable feedback for boosting true positives in cybersecurity tools.
Fine-Tune Your Cybersecurity with CloudGuard WAF
Across the various security tools that need to maximize their true positive rate, Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) are among the most important in the current threat landscape. Playing a vital role in both application security and cloud security, WAFs monitor HTTP/S traffic for malicious content to protect applications and APIs from abuse by cybercriminals aiming to expose sensitive data, manipulate business systems, and disrupt operations.
Extensive testing shows that CloudGuard WAF from Check Point offers the best true positive rate (>99%) compared to other leading vendors based on real-world threat datasets. Additionally, CloudGuard also offers the highest balanced accuracy, showing its high true positive rate comes with minimal false positives. This performance is powered by Check Point’s cutting-edge contextual AI analytics, which adapts to evolving threats and eliminates the constant fine-tuning and exception handling typically required with traditional WAFs.
Learn more about CloudGuard and its AI threat detection engine by booking a demo.
